During this last week I really am wishing I had the opportunity to attend the women's panel discussion. What was everyone's thoughts of the evening who went...if anyone reading this did go? Outside of that, the last few QOTW have been quite interesting. The show that sparked Teach's question this week got me thinking about other mainstream programming and how so many of these shows could actually be used for a pretty nice source of propoganda or education for many different health care related causes. It is a shame that you do not see these very popular programs taking advantage of their share of the public spotlight to help dismiss some of the negative stigmas that are attached to diseases like HIV/AIDS. Perhaps I just don't watch enough of them, but I have never heard of any primetime programs addressing the virus in the manner that some of the movies we watched did....not that everyone could handle the extent to which we were exposed, but it would be nice for people to actually catch a glimpse of it.
I guess it is just part of the culture that we live in. I remember when I was searching for the videos that we neeed to watch online, I found a channel that was broadcasting the "Common Threads" movie. I quickly realized that the channel was all centered around the gay lifestyle and their programming reflected many different facets of it such as the reality of HIV in their population and what the community was doing about it. Because HIV affects all people regardless of their background, it would be nice to see if the mainstream culture could take a lesson and begin to become pro-active with dealing with such major issues as HIV. Also as a side issue, I wonder if we will hear anything in the news about South Africa and their AIDS situation as the next World Cup moves closer to the time. I think if we did it would be out of the regular ignorance that we see in our society still today. That's about all for now, hope you found this just a little bit interesting.....
DID YOU KNOW?In light of our QOTW I have found some information regarding current HIV medications and renal transplants. With the discovery of the highly active antiretroviral therapy that was made to be available to people in 1996, there have been many more opportunities for people who are infected with HIV to actually have surgeries that can benefit them, when in the past it would be viewed as a waste (Tebas, 2009). I wanted to make sure that the whole article was brought through to here in case people couldn't access this information. It specifically talks about renal transplants in these paragraphs:
"A number of studies have demonstrated excellent outcomes in HIV-infected patients who undergo renal transplant. In one of the latest prospective studies performed in the HAART era, patient and allograft outcomes were reported among 18 kidney transplant recipients at a median follow-up of 3.4 years. Patient and allograft survival was 94 and 83 percent; these results are similar to that observed in the general kidney transplant population. One of the findings in the most current studies of renal transplantation in HIV-infected individuals has been the high frequency of rejection that frequently required the use of thymoglobulin. These individuals have had a remarkable and prolonged decrease in CD4 cell counts, which fortunately has not yet been associated with opportunistic infections." (Tebas, 2009)
"Preliminary results from multiple retrospective and some prospective studies show that clinical outcomes do not significantly differ between HIV-infected transplant recipients and HIV-seronegative patients enlisted in the UNOS database in the short term; the one-year survival rates appear comparable between the two groups." (Tebas, 2009)
This article also goes on to speak about other transplants such as heart and liver with some what similar results to the renal transplantation. Even though these surgeries are happening it is not without its problems. Medications that these individuals have to be on after their transplant so their body does reject the organ can have a strong reaction to the antiretrovirals for HIV and because of this it is very important to make sure that the medicine regimen is being monitored as closely as possible (Tebas, 2009).
Works Cited:
Tebas, P. (2009). Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV-infected Individuals. Retrieved from http://www.utdol.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=renltran/20766